US-CA · United States

California data centers and internet exchanges

PeeringDB's 2026-09-07 snapshot records 148 colocation facilities in California (US-CA) holding 2,183 network presences, concentrated in Los Angeles, and 20 internet exchanges, the largest being Equinix San Jose.

Facilities
148
Exchanges
20
Snapshot
2026-09-07
Country
United States (US)
Subdivision code
US-CA
Colocation facilities
148
Network presences
2,183
Internet exchanges
20 (1,074 participants)
Largest exchange
Equinix San Jose, San Jose
Main facility city
Los Angeles
Cities with facilities
33
Snapshot
2026-09-07

The 2026-09-07 PeeringDB snapshot records 20 exchanges and 148 facilities in California, United States. Their entries sum to 1,074 exchange participants and 2,183 facility network presences; the same network can appear more than once.

Internet exchanges in California

Exchanges are attributed to the state through the city they sit in, because PeeringDB records a state for facilities but not for exchanges.
Internet exchanges in California
ExchangeCityParticipants
Equinix San JoseSan Jose185
EVIXFremont170
FCIXFremont142
FREMIXFremont109
SFMIXSan Francisco93
Equinix Los AngelesLos Angeles83
Equinix Palo AltoPalo Alto69
BGP.Exchange - FremontFremont59
BGP.Exchange - Los AngelesLos Angeles42
MegaIX Los AngelesLos Angeles23

Showing the 10 exchanges with the most participants, of 20 recorded.

Colocation facilities in California

Buildings where networks put equipment. The network count is how many PeeringDB members list a presence there.

What these records establish

This page groups the saved exchange and facility records for California. A sum of participant or facility counts is not a count of unique networks, traffic volume, available capacity or service coverage.

PeeringDB is user-maintained. Its records describe reported interconnection infrastructure; they do not trace a particular request or locate a subscriber. A missing record in this snapshot is not proof that an operator has no presence or private connection in the area.

An IP geolocation result is a separate estimate. MaxMind documents accuracy limits and explains that its location data cannot identify a specific household, person or street address. This registry does not perform a geolocation lookup or measure where an individual device is located.

Mobile carriers in the United States

These selected carrier records provide ASN references for further checks. They do not establish a subscriber’s location or regional coverage.

Questions

How many exchanges and facilities are recorded in California?
20 exchanges and 148 facilities appear in the 2026-09-07 snapshot. The tables show the saved records and link to the publisher for current details.
Are the totals unique networks?
No. Participant entries are summed across exchanges and network presences across facilities. A network listed at several locations contributes to several entries.
Does a California IP label prove that a device is there?
No. These infrastructure records do not establish a device location. Consult the geolocation provider’s accuracy information and the specific network record for the claim you are evaluating.

Sources

PeeringDB supplies the facilities, network presence and exchange participants (snapshot 2026-09-07); MaxMind documents the limits of IP geolocation; the PROXIES.SX carrier registry lists the operators routing mobile addresses in this country.

  1. [1]https://www.peeringdb.com/
  2. [2]https://support.maxmind.com/knowledge-base/articles/maxmind-geolocation-accuracy
  3. [3]https://www.proxies.sx/carriers

These records describe where networks house equipment and interconnect. An IP address that geolocates to California does not show that a device is there: mobile carriers route wide areas through shared gateways, and geolocation databases estimate from registration data.